Up next in 10
I'll Be Detained For LIfe Till Unbiased Judge Takeover Case - Nnamdi Kanu
https://osazuwaakonedo.news/ill-be-detained-for-life-till-unbiased-judge-takeover-case-nnamdi-kanu/19/02/2025/
#Issues #Biafra #Kanu #Nnamdi ©February 19th, 2025 ®February 19, 2025 10:42 am Detained Leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu on Valentine’s day send a message to the lovers, supporters of the Biafra Republic agitation and the general public that he would remain in detention until impartial and unbiased judge takeover the case of alleged terrorism filed against him by the Federal Government of Nigeria, narrating how the judiciary has been biased against him since years of his detention. #OsazuwaAkonedo
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
the 10 leader of the indigenous people
0:02
of bafra IO n Cano and Valentine's Day
0:06
sent a message to the lovers supporters
0:09
of the Bea Republic agitation and the
0:11
general public that he would remain in
0:13
detention until impartial and unbiased
0:15
judge take over the case of alleged
0:17
terrorism filed against him by the
0:19
federal government of Nigeria narrating
0:22
how the Judiciary has been biast against
0:24
him since years of his detention in an
0:27
open letter to the General Public the
0:30
detained Bea leader who has continued
0:32
his agitation for the Declaration of Bea
0:35
Republic stated Below in quotes
0:38
greetings to all men and women of
0:40
Goodwill in Nigeria and elsewhere in the
0:43
world I have been compelled by the
0:45
events of the past few days to take the
0:48
unusual step of writing this open letter
0:50
for the singular purpose of calling the
0:52
attention of the general public to the
0:54
serial executive and judicial fraud
0:56
being perpetrated against me since my
0:59
extraordinary rendition in
1:01
2021 the details are as follows one in a
1:06
judgment entered on the 1st of March
1:08
2017 the federal High Court Abuja ruled
1:11
that the ipob is not an unlawful group
1:15
at the time it received widespread
1:18
publicity which can be verified from
1:20
van.com
1:23
2017/3 can- I this Landmark ruling met
1:28
by the court before it turned unjust
1:30
emanated in a criminal proceedings that
1:33
required proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt
1:36
and in which the federal government and
1:38
my humble self presented our respective
1:40
cases alas instead of the federal
1:44
government to go on appeal as the law
1:46
mandated if they are dissatisfied with
1:48
the Judgment the former Attorney General
1:51
abubakar malami went behind closed doors
1:53
with a letter signed by L aaki and got
1:56
prescribed t a terrorist group in an exp
1:59
party proceeding conducted without
2:00
notice to me or to the
2:02
ipob this abominable incident was the
2:05
earliest sign yet that the government
2:07
and its Judiciary have struck an Unholy
2:10
and fraudulent Alliance to deny me my
2:12
rights and thereby imperal the lives and
2:14
Liberty of millions who identity with
2:17
ipob two on the 26th of October
2:21
2022 a federal High Court declared my
2:24
extraordinary rendition and detention as
2:26
unconstitutional stating that the manner
2:29
of arrest and Detention of the applicant
2:32
Mai nanu in Kenya his continued
2:35
detention in Abuja his subjection to
2:37
physical and mental trauma by the
2:39
respondents the inhuman and degrading
2:41
treatment Meed out to the applicant
2:43
amounts to a brazing violation of the
2:45
applicants fundamental right to Dignity
2:47
of his person and threat to life under
2:49
section 341a of the 1999 constitution of
2:53
the federal republic of Nigeria as
2:55
amended the court further ordered the
2:58
federal government to app apologize to
3:00
me and pay me
3:01
compensation in a responsible and
3:04
well-ordered Society run by a
3:06
responsible government this judgment is
3:09
sufficient to have ended my lenty
3:11
detention and encourage the federal
3:13
government to constructively engage me
3:15
on the issue of the self-determination
3:17
agitation that triggered this whole Saga
3:21
three pedal back to the 13th of October
3:24
2022 when the court of appeal held that
3:27
the courts must never shy away from
3:29
calling the executive to order when the
3:31
result to acts of executive
3:34
lawlessness the duty of the courts is to
3:36
maintain a balance between ensuring that
3:39
Law and Order is obeyed and the
3:41
protection of the individual from
3:42
oppressive actions by the
3:45
executive by the forceable abduction and
3:47
extraordinary rendition of the appellant
3:50
maianu from Kenya to this country on the
3:53
27th day of June 2021 in violation of
3:57
international and state laws the lower
4:00
court or indeed any Court in this
4:02
country is divested of jurisdiction to
4:04
entertain charges against the appellant
4:07
despite the clarity of this judgment and
4:10
its compartment with reason the federal
4:13
government refused to release me from
4:15
detention while it went behind closed
4:17
doors and collided with three other
4:19
justices of the court of appeal who
4:21
fraudulently and swiftly sat on appeal
4:23
over the judgments and practically
4:25
destroyed it by issuing what the termed
4:28
a stay of execution
4:30
one may then ask is it not abominable
4:33
for a court to stay a judgment the
4:35
government already disobeyed in a pler
4:38
of cases the Supreme Court has held that
4:41
anybody who disobeys a related court
4:43
order cannot be given any judicial
4:46
relief until such order is obeyed this
4:49
is a sound reasoning that applied to
4:51
everybody but is fraudulently overlooked
4:53
when it comes to my case far fast
4:57
forward to the 15th of December 23 when
5:00
the Supreme Court sent back my case to
5:02
the federal high court for trial for
5:05
avoidance of doubt that was not the only
5:08
decision the Supreme Court made it also
5:11
decided that my girl should not have
5:13
been revoked and it went on to State
5:15
clearly that the judge exhibited
5:17
significant and unacceptable bias by
5:20
revoking my bell in a sense Society one
5:23
would expect that when the high court
5:26
received my case from the Supreme Court
5:28
and hankered down for trial
5:30
it was also Duty bound to restore my b
5:32
in line with the pronouncement of the
5:34
Apex court but that did not happen why
5:39
well your guess is as good mine and that
5:41
is the court connived with the federal
5:44
government to continue my detention in
5:46
violation of section
5:48
287 of the Nigerian Constitution while
5:50
the plotted to Railroad me through an on
5:53
fire trial that already has a
5:55
predetermined verdict five on the 24th
5:58
of September
6:00
2024 I decided that I have had enough of
6:03
taking my chances at getting Justice
6:05
from a judge that in June 2021 sent me
6:09
to secret police detention without Fair
6:12
hearing later refused to transfer me to
6:14
prison to better prepare for my trial
6:16
and CED it all by refusing to restore my
6:19
bill and instead ordered an accelerated
6:21
trial in the face of the reality that I
6:24
will never get a fair trial whilst
6:26
theend at the
6:27
DSs these are the mejor reasons that
6:30
compelled me to request recusal of the
6:32
judge and having consented to it she
6:35
proceeded to make an order removing
6:37
herself from my case that order was
6:40
never challenged on appeal thus it
6:42
remains extent to this day but instead
6:45
of the chief judge of the federal high
6:47
court to do the lawful Thing by
6:49
assigning my case to another judge he
6:52
conned with the federal government to
6:53
eat crow and send my case to a judge
6:56
that stands recused by a valid order to
6:59
to conclude this open letter let me make
7:02
it clear that it should in no way be
7:04
construed to mean that there are no
7:06
decent judges in Nigeria that can be
7:08
trusted to deliver evenhanded Justice in
7:11
my case that is not the issue instead
7:15
the issue is that my case is
7:17
deliberately being shielded from judges
7:19
and justices that are deemed to be
7:21
committed to doing Justice even when it
7:23
means that the federal government must
7:25
lose be that as it may if it will take
7:29
the rest of my life in detention to
7:31
produce me before a proper and impartial
7:34
court so be it but let me say this for
7:37
the world to know I will not succumb to
7:40
any trial conducted by any judge or
7:42
Court whose jurisdiction does not pass
7:45
constitutional muster not now not ever
7:49
thank you all signed by Mazi unu DET the
7:53
14th of February
7:56
2025 we had reported that Justice B of
7:59
federal high court in Abuja has adjoined
8:02
indefinitely after the detained leader
8:04
of indigenous people of bafra iob C has
8:08
seen in a privileged video footage
8:10
during February 10 2025 court session
8:13
sted a resistance protest in 16 one
8:16
confronting The Judge first to First
8:18
including the prosecuting council ad
8:21
that Justice V who is an indent of C
8:24
State same St with former president
8:26
muhammadu bhari is biased saying Justice
8:30
Inyo who had held a political position
8:32
of Kina State Attorney General and
8:34
Commissioner of justice that her court
8:36
is not a court of law but a shrine of
8:38
Injustice accusing the judge of PO nosen
8:41
with authorities to pass wrong judgments
8:43
against him in order to be left of the
8:45
hook by the federal government her son
8:48
Abdul AIS inako and her husband retired
8:51
vice admiral Malala inako who was once
8:53
chief of Novel staff Deputy Chief of
8:56
Defense staff Pioneer former military
8:58
governor of Niger St state two times
9:00
governor of Adama State who were
9:02
impeached twice by Adama State House of
9:04
Assembly for misconduct one of the
9:06
soldiers that fought against bafra
9:08
during Nigeria Civil War a current
9:10
member of the ruling all progressives
9:12
Congress APC who is facing corruption
9:15
charges alongside his son in a criminal
9:17
allegation filed before court of law
9:19
since 2015 by the economic and financial
9:21
crimes commission efcc over alleged
9:24
cases of abuse of office criminal
9:27
conspiracy death and money Ling we had
9:31
October 2024 reported that the chief
9:34
judge of federal high court in Nigeria
9:37
Justice John T Soo has rejected the
9:39
verbal plea by the detained indigenous
9:41
people of bafra iob leader n for the
9:45
trial judge in the case Justice B inako
9:48
to withdraw being the judge over the
9:50
lawsuits justice so stated that can's
9:53
case was reassigned to Justice inako due
9:56
to its prolonged nature in back to 2015
10:00
given that Justice inako had handled the
10:03
case for the most part she was deemed
10:05
the most suitable judge to see it
10:07
through to its
10:09
conclusion however the chief judge
10:11
directed that if at the next hearing of
10:14
the case Kos still insists on recusing
10:17
Justice inako he must file a written
10:19
motion with an affidavit stting all the
10:22
grounds for requesting the recusal we
10:25
had reported in September 2024 that
10:28
Justice B inako of federal High Court
10:30
sitting in Abuja have withdrawn from The
10:33
Case of the 10 bafra leader n canu after
10:36
the trial could not commence following
10:38
the baa leaders personal confrontation
10:40
with the judge for the second time in
10:42
the year we had reported in May 20124
10:46
that in a rare case in the history of
10:48
legal proceedings in the world nandu the
10:52
detain leader of the indigenous people
10:54
of bafra IOP helped himself at the
10:57
federal High Court sitting in Abuja and
10:59
played the role of a lawyer with full
11:01
energy and vibrant command of wordss
11:03
with Fearless loud voice defended
11:05
himself with first to First
11:06
confrontation with the trial judge
11:08
Justice bint inako and the federal
11:10
government prosecution council ad mua
11:13
aulu Koo is being prosecuted by the
11:16
federal government on a seven count
11:18
bordering on
11:22
terrorism say ne bringing you the news
11:26
in a more Digital Way
#Legal
#News
#Politics
#Constitutional Law & Civil Rights